No one really gives as much of a shit about you as you think

Image for post
Image for post

I guess we should cue this up by defining the 20–40–60 rule. We’re going to do that via here:

Originally espoused by actress Shirley MacLaine — andadhered to by Silicon Valley legend, entrepreneur and investor Heidi Roizen — the rule goes something like this: “At 20, you are constantly worrying about what other people think of you. At 40 you wake up and say, ‘I’m not going to give a damn what other people think anymore.’ And at 60 you realize no one is thinking about you at all.” The most important piece of information there, Roizen says: “Nobody is thinking about you from the very beginning.

Little sad, right? No doubt. She (Roizen) goes on to say “Your boss is not thinking about your, your peers are not thinking about you. You need to think about you.” This shouldn’t necessarily be true, but it is oftentimes true. (All situations are different and no generalization works for all, hence the term “generalization.”)

This is why, as the basic life path (i.e. having a standard job) has changed, we need to look at new ways of thinking about careers.

Although we haven’t necessarily done that either …

One more issue around the 20–40–60 Rule: The Temple of Busy

And you have to be realistic about your friends’ other responsibilities. Sometimes life is so busy that people may not be able to keep friendship from falling to the bottom of their priority list, much as they may desire otherwise.

In other words, busy > friendship. OK. This is why The New York Times called this “the golden age of bailing.” Tech makes it so much easier.

So does this make the 20–40–60 rule true? Is no one thinking about you from the very beginning?

It’s often more about not knowing how to interact (Part 1)

How many people you think reached out?

Maybe like 2–3 max, aside from people physically around me day-to-day.

Why you think?

Because I’m an asshole and they don’t care?

Maybe. That could apply to me, sadly. That’s a 2017–2018 goal right there.

I’d reckon the real reason is:

They don’t know what to say.

Work is the same shit. A lot of stuff at work is political, fraught, someone gets dressed down in a meeting, there are emotions over a project, someone’s dog dies, whatever. People don’t know what to say in those situations. Humans aren’t great with loss and failure discussions.

So sometimes it’s less 20–40–60 rule and more just people not knowing how to interact.

But nobody cares from the very beginning?

That should probably be a concern. But I do believe people care from the very beginning. I trust in humanity in this regard.

What about the work side of this 20–40–60 rule concept?

This is all why a “zero fucks given” approach to work isn’t that bad.

But look, at the end of the day…

Let’s hit my personal deal for a second. In that moment I got back from visiting my friend and I knew I’d open the door to a place we shared and it’d be half-empty, you think I had anyone else in that moment? Nope. Didn’t even have my dog. So sometimes you just got yourself, yes, but that doesn’t necessarily underscore the 20–40–60 rule. People have cared from the beginning and still do care. Don’t believe it except to think it’s a little bit funny. Rather, realize we’ve all got moments we get lifted up, and we’ve all got moments we gotta do it ourselves. Ain’t life grand?

Anything you got on the 20–40–60 rule?

Written by

Blogging, largely about work and how to improve it. How I make (some) money: http://thecontextofthings.com/hire-freelance-writer-ted-bauer/

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store