Are we “post-expertise” now?

Image for post
Image for post

Let’s start with the obvious: No, we are not post-expertise. I watch a ton of true crime, and there’s some couple in The Netherlands who are global experts on blood splatter and get called to trials all over the world about that stuff. That is legitimate expertise. Professors are usually experts in one major thing; I have a friend of a friend who’s (whose?) brother is like the leading global expert on Instagram and teenage female depression. (Hell of a life’s work there, eh?) I know lawyers through friends who are experts at intellectual property casework, which seems like it will be big money for the next 20–25 years, if not longer. So, expertise does exist, for sure. There are pockets of it everywhere in our society.

But on the other side of expertise, there’s a lot of “faux-expertise,” or even “Post-Expertise.” One obvious example is how the Trump administration did some of their appointments. Being appointed to a cabinet post is a lifelong career arc ambition for many; Jared Kushner was legit picking appointees by browsing Amazon book titles. That feels like “Post-Expertise.” As far back as 2015, Americans were distrusting science, which is crazy. There are batshit crazy scientists, sure — but in general the scientific method is something we’ve upheld and vetted for years. Foreign Affairs wrote an article in 2017 about the first world “losing faith in expertise,” and The New York Times has done some book reviews about “ignorance now being a virtue.”

This all touches a lot of different topics: The role of education, keyboard warriors, and, yes, LinkedIn. Let’s actually start there.

LinkedIn and the decline of expertise

It’s pretty easy to claim to be an expert on something on LinkedIn. Just toss it in your headline. “Thought leader” is a common example, but you’ll see stuff like “Bitcoin Expert,” as typified by this meme:

Image for post
Image for post

Now, again, there’s a decent amount to unpack here. Let’s go one-by-one:

  • Do people really use LinkedIn? Yes and no. The dirty little secret of LinkedIn is active users, which makes sense. If you’re a big wig at some place or not seeking a job or trying to sell a book, why would you log on LinkedIn often?

That’s some of the stuff tied to LinkedIn and expertise. You also need to remember LinkedIn is broadly a cesspool of virtue-signaling, meaning some guy will post about how he was homeless, had to eat a rat for dinner, and now he is 10x’ing his quarters as a Honeywell sales guy. All you need to do is buy his class or book! A lot of that is bullshit, and buying the class won’t make you successful. That guy was probably successful because he (a) wanted it, (b) needed it, and © Honeywell gave him a process to follow. The class won’t help you with A, B, or C. So LinkedIn has scaled the idea of this “Post-Expertise” world, sure, but with some self-awareness, we can realize a lot of that is phony.

What else plays into all this?

Well, Trump, for sure. He broadly treats the Presidency like a business he might sell for scraps down the road, so there’s not a ton of “expertise” in there.

Online forums and keyboard warriors, sure. Scream at people, meme them, call them names, manifesto them, hit them with biased links, no context for debate, etc. Without nuance, it’s hard to develop expertise.

Decline of education, both in the form of us lip-servicing the value of education and us turning higher education into an arms race. Less effective education = less ability to develop expertise.

Temple of Busy stuff too — → it’s more important to be seen as “busy” than “productive” or “expert” at most jobs. And what’s always been funny to me is that even though experts, i.e. subject matter experts, would help a lot in a sales process — prospects usually want to hear from those that know what they are talking about — oftentimes executives “protect” these experts by talking about how busy they are. You want to be busy, or you want to sell widgets? Make a decision, Bob.

Lack of trust plays in here too. Trust is more of a human currency than money, IMHO, but trust in the workplace is not very high, and trust in executive-level ranks is basically in the toilet. If you don’t trust what you’re hearing, how can “expertise” take hold?

Anything I missed, or any takes you have on the decline of expertise over time? Holler.

Written by

Blogging, largely about work and how to improve it. How I make (some) money:

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store